Every man has human rights. Fundamental human rights, the right to live, the right to choose who he wants as a leader, the right to life.
I am grown from a staunch conservative like every “properly-trained” perspective to one that involves libertarian and me being nonreligious.
The fundamental principle of my beliefs right now being “As long as my right does not invade yours, let me be”
Analyzing this theory, I’m trying to look at some things that may come to mind.
For example, the parent-child relationship.
As a parent, responsibility of the child belongs to the parent. However, there should come a point where the child should be assumed to be an adult and be aware of his/her responsibilities.
Before that time, the right of the child belongs to the parent, in which time the parent performs what is in the best interest of the child, i.e education, feeding, housing, shelter etc.
As the child grows older, s/he is able to discern right from wrong based on what s/he has been learned from parents as well as personal experience. At a certain age, the child becomes responsible for his/her decisions or actions.
Crimes against a state should be those ones that hamper the rights of one or more people’s rights as well.
For example, one maybe a racist or have ignorant views, but as long as one does not put those views into any form of action which hampers the rights of another man. Such things as peaceful protests are nothing to be seen as wrong…nothing that provokes violence should be tolerated.
In addition, forceful teaching of one’s doctrines is wrong and should not be tolerated. Although one has a right to express his views, one should not impose his/her views on another person. That person has a right to choose what he or she believes in, as mature thinking adult human beings.
That is my problem against religion.
0 comments:
Post a Comment